From each of the furniture needs, the chair may be the primary one. While the majority of other forms (save for the bed) are designed to support objects, the chair supports your human form. The term chair is viewed here in the larger sense, from stool to throne to further kinds like the bench or sofa, which may be seen as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not clearly distinuishable.
The social history of the chair is as interesting as its history as a creative craft. The chair is not just a physical support and/or an aesthetic craft; it historically was semiotic of social rank. From the past royal courts there were significant differences between having a chair with arms, or a chair with a back but no arms, or worse having to sit on a stool. In the past century, the director’s and/or manager’s chair has been regarded as an identifier of superior position, and in democratic government debate the speaker sits on an elevated platform.
As its furniture construction, the chair can be employed for a wealth of various forms. There are chairs created to suit man’s age and physical condition (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to indicate his status in society (the executive chair, the throne). During the olden days there were chairs for births (birth chairs); from the 20th century, there have been chairs to die in (the electric chair). We have chairs with one, two, three, and/or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We make chairs that can be folded up, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Our contemporary lifestyle has designated particular chairs for automobiles and aircraft. All these chair kinds has been perfected to match to differing human desires. From its particular importance with man, the chair lives to its full advantage only when utilised. Whereas it doesn’t make a difference to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a chest of drawers if there are things inside or not, a chair is really understood and judged best with a person using it, because chair and sitter need one another. Thus the different limbs of the chair are given labels like the limbs of the human shape: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the simple purpose of your chair is to support your body, its credit is judged primarily on how well it measures up to this practical use. Within the design of a chair, the builder is bound by particular static rules and principal measurements. Within these rules, however, the chair creator has large freedom.
The history of the chair is an epoch of several thousand years. There were societies that held significant chair shapes, as expressions of the highest endeavour in the arenas of technique and art. Among these such cultures, special note should be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the lifetimes of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the objects of careful make, are now known from findings made in tombs. The first one of the two is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The iconic Egyptian chair would have four legs structured as akin to those of a designated animal, a curved seat, leading to a sloping back supported from vertical stretchers. In this way a durable triangular construction was obtained. There was from our view no particular differentiation from the creation of Egyptian thrones and chairs for ordinary peasantry. The simple variation lies in the kind of ornamentation, in the choice of expensive inlays. The Egyptian folding stool in all likelihood was created as an easily packed seat for army soldiers. As a camp stool that chair continued til much later days. But the stool then was designed for the role of a ceremonial seat, its technical job as a folding stool ignored or forgotten. This can from today’s evidence be noted, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, created in ebony with ivory inlay work and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They are constructed in the form of folding stools but cannot be folded as the seats were made from wood. The plain construction of the folding stool, made of two frames that spin on metal bolts and hold a seat of leather or fabric secured between them, reappears somewhat later during the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The best known of these is the folding stool, made of ashwood, which is now at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The archetypal Greek chair, the klismos, is seen not with any ancient specimen still around but seen in a large amount of pictorial items. The most recognisable is the klismos placed on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial location by Athens (c. 410 BC). This klismos is a chair with a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, only two of those could be visible. These unusual legs were most likely crafted of bent wood and were likely to have been had huge pressure under the weight of the sitter. The joints securing the legs to the frame of the seat are therefore very solid and were visibly signified.
The Romans emulated the Greek designs; quite a few models of seated Romans show evidence of a thicker and in appearance rather less delicately designed klismos. Both styles, light and heavy, were brought back in the Classicist period. The klismos style is found in French Empire styles, in English Regency, and in some brands of marked originality in Denmark and Sweden around 1800.
China
The progression of the chair in China is not able to be tracked as far as the progression of the chairs in Egypt and Greece. Since the time of the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an unscathed collection of images and artworks was kept safe, displaying the insides and outer parts of Chinese households and their furniture. Also kept of the 16th century are some chairs crafted from wood or lacquered wood, that hold an amazing resemblance to representations of ancient chairs.
Just the same as in Egypt, there existed two particular chair forms in China: a chair of four legs and a folding stool. This four-legged chair is found both with and without arms though never missing its square seat and straight stiles (standing side supports) to support the back. In one type, though, the stiles are slightly curved on top of the arms to fit the form of the S-shaped back splat (the main upright of the back). Together, all three areas were mortised onto the yoke-like top rail. While the innovation of a back splat had an introduction for English chairs during the Queen Anne period, wooden pieces that only to a limited extent reinforce corner joints (and were loose in the result) signify a feature particular to Chinese chairs. The four legs are set through the seat frame, which ends over the rounded staves. Members are round in section or has rounded edges—references maybe to the bamboo tradition. The seat is not comfortable and may have had a plaited texture. These chairs needed the sitter to hold themselves stiff and upright; if too much weight is exerted on the back, the chair has a tendency to fall. In patriarchal Chinese households of this period armchairs presumably were allowed only for senior people in the family, for they were greatly respected.
The Chinese folding stool is believed to have travelled to China from the West. It is akin that much from the Egyptian and Scandinavian folding stools, but it has a variation in that the top rail is delicately held to the two legs of the stool by use of a curved member, which is generally provided with metal mounts. From a Western point of view the ultimate effect of both of these furniture items is stylized. The constructive and decorative parts are combined in a style that is both naïve and refined. The piecemeal appearance is an outcome of the way that the individual members do not look to have been adjoined by means of either glue or screws, but were mortised on one another and locked into its place in the style of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain of the 17th century also put its name on the chair. Works of art project a kind of chair with a relatively unrefined wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, possessing two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing between, stitched to bring out a pattern of small pads. The front board and a related board from the back could be folded after loosening some small iron hooks. In this way the chair was a readily portable piece of furniture in traveling which, at the same time, granted the status of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered design of chair is seen in engravings of interiors of wealthy Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, and also in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. While this style of chair can also be seen in countries in which Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won preference, it is not believed that the innovation actually was instigated in The Netherlands. Generally, the legs of the chair were smooth, round in section, and of slim dimensions; they are occasionally baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is patently a bourgeois piece of furniture and was produced in considerable amounts, as surmisable from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which there is a row of these chairs lined up by a wall. The design asserts itself by virtue of its harmonious proportions and expensive upholstery in gilt leather or fabric bordered with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature style—that was, as developed in Paris around 1750—spread through most of Europe and was imitated or copied in the mid-20th century. The chair owes this popularity to a combination of leisure and charm. The seat conforms to the human body and permits a relaxed seated position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Typically the seat and back are upholstered, and there are tiny upholstered pads on the armrests. Smooth transitions achieved between seat frame, legs, and back disguise all the joints, which are constructed solidly on craftsmanlike methods despite the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of those use wood of relatively thick density; but each member is deeply molded, all superfluous wood has been taken away, and more expensive examples can be further embellished with special delicate and decorative carving. The wood may be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry may be used for the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; crosshatched cane is occasionally used instead of upholstery.
English chairs of the 18th century were more differentiated in style than the French. The French touch for stylistic uniformity, which disseminated from the highest circles in Paris and Versailles within most of France and became the preference in many parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became reknowned and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
In the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper brands of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, purport that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on office storage in Melbourne contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.