Of all furniture forms, the chair may be the imperative one. While many other objects (except the bed) are devised to support objects, the chair supports your human form. The term chair is viewed here in the most general sense, from stool to throne to developed types for example a bench or sofa, which might be looked upon as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not clearly distinguished.
The social history of the chair is as curious as its history as a creative art. The chair is not only a physical support and/or an aesthetic creation; it historically is a symbol of social placement. Within the Medieval royal courts there were clear differences between having a chair with arms, or a chair with a back but no arms, and having to use a stool. Since the last century, the director’s and/or manager’s chair has been regarded as a symbol of superior position, and in democratic government meeting the speaker sits on an elevated floor.
In a furniture creation, the chair holds a number of various forms. There are chairs designed to fit man’s age and physical capabilities (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to denote his status in society (the executive chair, the throne). In past times there were chairs to be born in (birth chairs); from the 20th century, there have been chairs to die in (the electric chair). We make chairs with one, two, three, or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. There are chairs that can be folded for easy storage, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Modern day living has derived special chairs for use in automobiles and aircraft. Each and every one of these chair forms have been adapted to match to growing human uses. From its significant connection with man, the chair comes to its full purpose only when being utilised. Whereas it does not make a difference to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a dresser drawers if there are items inside or not, a chair is understood best and fairly evaluated by a person sitting in it, for chair and sitter complement one another. Thus the various elements of a chair are given labels according to the parts of a human form: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the simple function of your chair is to support the human body, its credit is evaluated firstly on how fully it does fulfill this practical function. Within the creation of a chair, the chair maker is restricted under particular static regulations and principal measurements. Within these rules, however, the chair designer has marvellous freedom.
The history of the chair lasted over dates of several thousand years. There were peoples that had distinctive chair shapes, as expressive of the premier object in the arenas of skill and art. Within such peoples, particular mention must be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the lives of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the structures of masterful scheme, were known from discoveries made in tombs. One of these two is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The original Egyptian chair would have four legs structured not unlike those of an animal, a curved seat, and leading to a sloping back supported with vertical stretchers. From this a stable triangular form was crafted. There was from our view no marked variation in the design of Egyptian thrones and chairs for typical citizens. The real difference exists in the intricacy of its ornamentation, in the evidence of more valuable inlays. The Egyptian folding stool in all likelihood was manufactured as an easily carried seat for army soldiers. As a camp stool the stool stayed until much later days. But the stool also then was created as the role of a ceremonial seat, its mechanical role as a folding stool neglected or forgotten. This can today be observed, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, created in ebony with ivory inlay ornamentation and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They are made in the form of folding stools but are not able to be folded as the seats were formed of wood. The simplistic make of the folding stool, made of two frames that spin on metal bolts and have a seat of leather or fabric fastened between them, is seen again somewhat later from the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The better known of those is the folding stool, crafted from ashwood, which can now be seen at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The archetypal Greek chair, the klismos, is known not as any ancient specimen still existing but as seen from a wealth of pictorial objects. The most recognisable is the klismos placed on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial area by Athens (c. 410 BC). It is a chair that had a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, only two of those can be displayed. These strange legs were presumably crafted in bent wood and were probably had to bear huge pressure from the weight of the sitter. The joints holding the legs to the frame of the seat are therefore super solid and were particularly signified.
The Romans embued the Greek style; evidence of casts of seated Romans show examples of a heavier and which appear to be a slightly crudely designed klismos. Both kinds, the light or the heavy, were seen again during the Classicist era. The klismos chair can be found in French Empire styles, in English Regency, and in some special forms of considerable uniqueness within Denmark and Sweden from 1800.
China
The progression of the chair in China isn’t able to be traced as long as chairs in Egypt and Greece. From the time of the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an unscathed serial of sketches and artworks had been kept, displaying the interiors and outside of Chinese households and the furniture. Also preserved from the 16th century are a number of chairs crafted of wood or lacquered wood, that show an amazing similarity to images of past chairs.
Same as in Egypt, there were two particular chair designs in China: a chair of four legs and a folding stool. The four-legged chair was constructed both with and without arms though never without the square seat and straight stiles (upright side supports) to support the back. In one image, though, the stiles were slightly curved over the arms so as to conform correctly to the angle of the S-shaped back splat (the central upright of a chairback). The three sections are mortised onto the yoke-like top rail. Though the design of this back splat exercised a foundation for English chairs from the Queen Anne period, wooden members that could merely to a limited capability embolden corner joints (and then are loose as a result) are a feature signatory to Chinese chairs. The four legs pass through the seat frame, which ends upon the rounded staves. All the members are round in section or possesses rounded edges—referable perchance to the bamboo tradition. The seat is not comfortable and may have had a plaited texture. These chairs needed the sitter to stay stiff and upright; for if too much pressure is placed on the back, the chair has a way of toppling over. In patriarchal Chinese houses of this period armchairs probably were reserved only for older persons in the family, for they were respected greatly.
The Chinese folding stool is understood to have been brought to China from the West. It does not vary much from the Egyptian and Scandinavian folding stools, but it possesses a variation in that the top rail is delicately affixed to the two legs of the stool by using a curved member, which is more often than not seen with metal mounts. From a Western point of view the ultimate effect of both of these furniture designs is stylized. The construction and aesthetic aspects are combined in a manner that is simultaneously naïve and refined. The piecemeal appearance is an outcome of the fact that the individual parts do not appear to have been joined together by use of either glue or screws, but have been mortised into one another and locked into its place in the manner of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain of the 17th century also had its mark on the chair. Paintings display a design of chair with a relatively brusque wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, consisting of two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing in between the layers, stitched to show up a pattern of little pads. The front board and a related board at the back could be folded after unscrewing some tiny iron hooks. Therefore the chair was an easily portable piece of furniture in traveling which, during the same time, possessed the dignity of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered style of chair can be evidenced in engravings of the interiors of wealthy Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, and also in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. While this kind of chair can also be made in countries in which Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won favour, it is not believed that the style actually was instigated in The Netherlands. Typically, the legs of the chair were smooth, round in section, and of slim shape; they are in some cases baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is patently a bourgeois piece of furniture and was crafted in vast amounts, as indicated from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which there is a whole row of these chairs lined up along a wall. The style asserts itself by its shapely proportions and fine upholstery in gilt leather or fabric edged with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature of forms—that is to say, as progressed in Paris around 1750—disseminated over most of Europe and has been imitated or copied into the mid-20th century. The design owes this popularity to a combination of relaxation and elegance. The seat suits to the human body and allows a relaxed sitting position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Typically the seat and back are upholstered, and there are tiny upholstered pads covering the armrests. Smooth transitions are found between seat frame, legs, and back cover all the joints, which are constructed strongly on craftsmanlike principles despite the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of them use wood of relatively thick dimensions; but all the members are deeply molded, all superfluous wood has been sanded away, and finer examples might be further embellished with intricately delicate and decorative carving. The wood may be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry is usually used for all the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; canework is sometimes used rather than upholstery.
English chairs in the 18th century were more varied in style than the French. The French manner for stylistic uniformity, which lead from the highest circles in Paris and Versailles throughout most of France and found favour in many parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became well-known and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
In the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper styles of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, suggest that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on office furniture in Brisbane contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.