Out of all furniture forms, the chair could be of most importance. While most of the other items (save for the bed) are created to support objects, the chair supports your human form. The term chair should be looked upon here in the wider sense, from stool to throne to further types for example a bench or sofa, which can be regarded as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not obviously distinuishable.
The social history of the chair is as stimulating as its history as an art and craft. The chair is not simply a physical support and an aesthetic artwork; it historically is an indicator of social standing. Within the historical royal courts there were significant connotations between possessing a chair with arms, sitting on a chair with a back but no arms, or having to make do with a stool. During the last century, a director’s and/or manager’s chair has developed an identifier of superior rank, and in democratic government debate the speaker sits on an elevated level.
As a furniture form, the chair ranges from a wealth of various forms. There are chairs created to fit man’s age and physical capabilities (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to connotate his status in society (the executive chair, the throne). From historical days there were chairs used for birthing (birth chairs); during the 20th century, there have been chairs used for ending life (the electric chair). We make chairs with one, two, three, and/or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We make chairs that can be folded up, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Modern day living has developed particular chairs in automobiles and aircraft. Each of these chair forms have been changed to fit to differing human requirements. Due to its close relationship with man, the chair appears to its full importance only when in use. While it does not make a difference to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a chest of drawers whether there is anything inside or not, a chair is really seen and fairly tested by a person sitting in it, because chair and sitter require the other. Thus the different elements of a chair are given names like the names of a human shape: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the clear job of a chair is to support a human body, its credit is valued firstly on how completely it does measure up to this practical role. Within the structure of a chair, the designer is bound with particular static regulation and principal measurements. Under these limits, however, the chair builder has extensive freedom.
The history of the chair lasts over a period of several thousand years. There existed peoples that held distinctive chair types, as expressive of the principal task in the areas of technique and design. Within these such peoples, special mention must be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the reigns of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the objects of careful scheme, are seen from discoveries made in tombs. One of these is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The classical Egyptian chair would have four legs formed like those of a particular animal, a curved seat, leading to a sloping back supported from vertical stretchers. From this design a stable triangular design was created. There was to our understanding no noteworthy change in the structure of Egyptian thrones and chairs for regular populace. The only variation lied in the decorative ornamentation, in the particulars of costly inlays. The Egyptian folding stool most likely was developed to be an easily carried seat for army. As a camp stool the stool continued until much later points in time. But the stool also then was created as the character of a ceremonial seat, its original history as a folding stool being forgotten. This can already be noted, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, crafted in ebony with ivory inlay ornamentation and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They were in the shape of folding stools but can’t be folded as the seats are formed out of wood. The simplistic make of the folding stool, composed of two frames that turn on metal bolts and support a seat of leather or fabric secured between them, appeared again at some time later as the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The better known of this form is the folding stool, crafted out of ashwood, which is now found at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The typical Greek chair, the klismos, is seen not as any ancient fossil still extant but as seen in a large amount of pictorial items. The best recognised is the klismos placed on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial location near Athens (c. 410 BC). The klismos is a chair with a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, but only two of which were shown. These unusual legs were possibly executed out of bent wood and were therefore needed to bear huge pressure with the weight of the sitter. The joints attaching the legs to the frame of the seat would have had to be therefore very strong and were clearly drawn.
The Romans embued the Greek designs; existing casts of seated Romans show evidence of a denser and apparently rather less intricately constructed klismos. Both designs, light or heavy, were popularised in the Classicist period. The klismos design can be found in French Empire furniture, in English Regency, and in special forms of marked uniqueness within Denmark and Sweden around 1800.
China
The progression of the chair in China isn’t able to be charted as far as the history of the chair in Egypt and Greece. From the time of the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an undamaged folio of sketches and artworks was preserved, showing the inside and exteriors of Chinese homes and their furniture. Kept also of the 16th century are a number of chairs crafted from wood or lacquered wood, that display an amazing resemblance to representations of older chairs.
As in Egypt, two iconic chair forms existed in China: a chair having four legs and a folding stool. This chair can be constructed both with and without arms however always with the square seat and straight stiles (straight side supports) to firm the back. In one type, it must be said, the stiles are lightly curved by the arms for the purpose of fit the structure of the S-shaped back splat (the central upright of its back). All three sections had been mortised into the yoke-like top rail. Despite that the idea of a back splat exercised an introduction for English chairs of the Queen Anne period, wooden items that could only to a restricted capability stabilise corner joints (and furthermore were loose as well) represent a design exclusive to Chinese chairs. The four legs are set through the seat frame, which stops around the rounded staves. Members are round in section or have rounded edges—acknowledging maybe to the bamboo tradition. The seat is uncomfortable and had on occasion a plaited seat. These chairs required the sitter to be stiff and upright; for if too much weight is exerted on the back, the chair has a way of toppling. In patriarchal Chinese households of this period armchairs presumably were reserved for the senior individuals, for they were held in great respect.
The Chinese folding stool is presumed to have been brought to China from the West. It does not differ very much from the Egyptian and Scandinavian folding stools, but it possesses a variation in that the top rail is intricately joined to the two legs of the stool by use of a curved member, which is often designed with metal mounts. From a Western point of view the ultimate effect of these furniture styles is stylized. The construction and aesthetic parts are combined in a way that is all at once naïve and refined. The patchwork appearance is an upshot of the fact that the individual items do not look to have been adjoined by use of either glue or screws, but had been mortised onto one another and held in place in the manner of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain of the 17th century also put its signature on the chair. Paintings show a type of chair with a relatively unrefined wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, having only two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing in between the layers, stitched to bring out a pattern of small pads. The front board and a similar board at the back could be folded after unscrewing some tiny iron hooks. In this way the chair was an easily portable piece of furniture for traveling which, at the same period, held the status of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered type of chair can be displayed in engravings of the interiors of affluent Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, and in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. While this style of chair might also be found in countries where Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won preference, it is not believed that the form actually was instigated in The Netherlands. Typically, the legs of the chair were smooth, round in section, and of slender measurements; they are occasionally baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is obviously a bourgeois piece of furniture and was manufactured in considerable numbers, as can be seen from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which an entire row of this kind of chairs lined up by a wall. The style asserts itself with its elegant proportions and expensive upholstery in gilt leather or fabric edged with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature of forms—that is, as brought out in Paris around 1750—disseminated through most of Europe and has been imitated or copied during the mid-20th century. The style owes the popularity to a combination of comfort and elegance. The seat conforms to the human body and grants a relaxed seated position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Generally the seat and back are upholstered, and there are small upholstered pads on the armrests. Smooth transitions achieved between seat frame, legs, and back conceal all the joints, which are constructed strongly on craftsmanlike practices even with the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of those are constructed from wood of relatively thick dimensions; but all the members are deeply molded, all extraneous wood has been sanded away, and more upmarket items would be further embellished with intricately delicate and decorative engraving. The wood may be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry is often used for all upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; canework is in some cases used rather than upholstery.
English chairs of the 18th century were more differentiated in style than the French. The French taste for stylistic uniformity, which lead from the royal circles in Paris and Versailles through most of France and became the preference in many parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became reknowned and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
During the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper products of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, indicate that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on executive furniture in Melbourne contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.