Out of each of the furniture pieces, the chair might be the imperative one. While most of the other pieces (apart from the bed) are meant to support objects, the chair supports your human form. The term chair is used here in the most common sense, from stool to throne to further forms including the bench or sofa, which may be regarded as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not clearly distinguished.
The social history of the chair is as curious as its history as an art and craft. The chair is not just a physical support and aesthetic craft; it historically was an indicator of social hierarchy. At the Medieval royal courts there were social signifiers between possessing a chair with arms, sitting on a chair with a back but without arms, and having to use a stool. In the recent century, the director’s and/or manager’s chair has been regarded as an indicator of superior position, as well as in democratic governments the speaker sits on a higher platform.
In its furniture creation, the chair can be utilised for a number of various models. There are chairs structured to match man’s age and physical abilities (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to indicate his status in society (the executive chair, the throne). From historical times there were chairs to be born in (birth chairs); since the 20th century, there have been chairs for ending life (the electric chair). We have chairs with one, two, three, and/or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We can have chairs that can be folded, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Our modern lifestyle has demanded special chairs for automobiles and aircraft. Each and every one of these chair kinds has changed to conform to differing human desires. From its particular connection with man, the chair exists to its full purpose only when utilised. Though it does not make any difference to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a bureau if there might be items inside or not, a chair is understood best and evaluated with a person sitting in it, because chair and sitter complement the other. Thus the individual elements of the chair have been named according to the limbs of the human body: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the elemental role of the chair is to support our human body, its credit is tested basically by how well it does fulfill this practical role. Within the construction of the chair, the maker is restricted in certain static regulation and principal measurements. Within these limitations, however, the chair maker has awesome freedom.
The history of the chair was an era of several thousand years. There are societies that had unique chair shapes, expressive of the foremost work in the areas of craft and aesthetics. Within these such societies, particular note can be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the ascendancy of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the items of expert craft, are a finding from tomb findings. The first of them is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The original Egyptian chair had four legs shaped as akin to those of a particular animal, a curved seat, and with a sloping back supported above vertical stretchers. From this design a strong triangular structure was made. There was to our understanding no notable difference in the structure of Egyptian thrones and chairs for regular non-royals. The main difference exists in the complexity of ornamentation, in the choice of more valuable inlays. The Egyptian folding stool in all probability was crafted for an easily stored seat for soldiers. As a camp stool this type stayed around for much later times. But the stool also then was created as the task of a ceremonial seat, its original job as a folding stool ignored or forgotten. This can now be observed, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, formed in ebony with ivory inlay ornamentation and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They were constructed in the shape of folding stools but cannot be folded because the seats are made from wood. The simple manufacture of the folding stool, composed of two frames that cycle on metal bolts and hold a seat of leather or fabric secured between them, was then seen at some time later from the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The better known of those is the folding stool, made out of ashwood, now seen at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The archetypal Greek chair, the klismos, is found not from any ancient specimen still existing but from a variety of pictorial evidence. The significant kind is the klismos posited on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial area near Athens (c. 410 BC). The klismos is a chair with a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, but only two of those can be seen. These unique legs were presumed to be manufactured of bent wood and were probably subjected to extreme pressure under the weight of the sitter. The joints attaching the legs to the frame of the seat were therefore super durable and were plainly denoted.
The Romans borrowed from the Greek style; some models of seated Romans display evidence of a more heavyset and are a rather crudely constructed klismos. Both designs, the light and heavy, were seen again as part of the Classicist era. The klismos influence is seen in French Empire chairs, in English Regency, and in some kinds of considerable iconicism of Denmark and Sweden from 1800.
China
The past of the chair in China is not able to be tracked as far as the history of the chair in Egypt and Greece. Since the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) a full series of drawings and paintings was kept safe, detailing the insides and exteriors of Chinese homes and their furniture. Also kept since the 16th century are some chairs of wood or lacquered wood, that show an astonishing similarity to images of past chairs.
As was the case in Egypt, two fundamental chair forms existed in China: a chair of four legs and a folding stool. This four-legged chair can be designed both with and without arms however always with its square seat and straight stiles (straight side supports) to firm the back. In one style, it has been found, the stiles are lightly curved over the arms so as to sit right with the angle of the S-shaped back splat (the central upright of its back). All three areas had been mortised in the yoke-like top rail. Though the idea of a back splat had an influence on English chairs during the Queen Anne period, wooden pieces that just to a limited capability embolden corner joints (and furthermore were loose additionally) signify an element solely to Chinese chairs. The four legs are set through the seat frame, which stops over the rounded staves. All the members are round in section or is given rounded edges—references as may be to the bamboo tradition. The seat is uncomfortable and might have had a plaited seat. These chairs needed the sitter to remain stiff and upright; for if too much weight is pushed on the back, the chair has a way of toppling. In patriarchal Chinese houses of this period armchairs likely were kept only for the senior people in the family, for they were given great esteem.
The Chinese folding stool is understood to have taken to China from the West. It does not vary that much from the Egyptian or Scandinavian folding stools, but it possesses a variation in that the top rail is intricately fixed to the two legs of the stool by means of a curved member, which is more often than not seen with metal mounts. From a Western viewpoint the resultant effect of these two furniture designs is stylized. The constructive and decorative issues are combined in a way that is at the same time naïve and refined. The pieced-together appearance is an upshot of the fact that the individual items do not look to have been put together with either glue or screws, but had been mortised onto one another and held in position in the manner of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain during the 17th century also had its mark on the chair. Works of art display a style of chair with a relatively brusque wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, possessing two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing between, stitched to bring up a pattern of tiny pads. The front board and a related board from the back could be folded after unscrewing some tiny iron hooks. In this way the chair was a portable piece of furniture in traveling which, at the same era, held the status of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered style of chair is found in engravings of the interiors of rich Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, as well as in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. While this type of chair may also be made in countries where Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won acclaim, it is not held that the form actually originated in The Netherlands. Normally, the legs of the chair were smooth, round in section, and of slender dimensions; they are sometimes baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is obviously a bourgeois piece of furniture and was manufactured in considerable numbers, as indicated from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which there is a whole row of this kind of chairs lined up along a wall. The style asserts itself by its shapely proportions and delicate upholstery in gilt leather or fabric edged with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature form—that was, as brought out in Paris around 1750—disseminated over most of Europe and has been imitated or copied during the mid-20th century. The style owes this popularity to a combination of relaxation and elegance. The seat adheres to the human body and allows a relaxed seated position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Usually the seat and back are upholstered, and there are little upholstered pads over the armrests. Smooth transitions achieved between seat frame, legs, and back cover all the joints, which are solidly constructed on craftsmanlike practices despite the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of them employ wood of relatively thick density; but all the members are deeply molded, all extraneous wood has been sanded away, and more upmarket designs might be further embellished with very delicate and decorative carvings. The wood could be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry may be used for the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; crosshatched cane is occasionally used instead of upholstery.
English chairs from the 18th century were more differentiated in design than the French. The French touch for stylistic uniformity, which lead from the most distinguished circles in Paris and Versailles throughout most of France and won favour in many parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became reknowned and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
In the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper brands of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, purport that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on reception desks in Brisbane contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.