Out of each of the furniture objects, the chair might be of most importance. While many other pieces (except the bed) are meant to support objects, the chair supports your human form. The term chair is viewed here in the widest sense, from stool to throne to complex types including a bench or sofa, which may be seen as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not obviously distinguished.
The social history of the chair is as stimulating as its history as art and craft. The chair is not merely a physical support and aesthetic piece; it was also an indicator of social place. At the Medieval royal courts there were significant connotations between sitting on a chair with arms, sitting on a chair with a back but no arms, or having to cope with a stool. In the past century, a director’s and manager’s chair has developed a symbol of superior standing, like in democratic governments the speaker sits on a high-set floor.
In its furniture purpose, the chair is used for a variety of variations. There are chairs designed to fit man’s age and physical form (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to connotate his standing in society (the executive chair, the throne). Since historical times there were chairs for birthing (birth chairs); from the 20th century, there have been chairs to die in (the electric chair). There are chairs with one, two, three, or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We make chairs that can be folded and put away, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Modern day living has developed new chairs for automobiles and aircraft. Each of these chair kinds has adapted to conform to growing human needs. From its close importance with man, the chair appears to its full meaning only when utilised. Whereas it isn’t relevant to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a bureau whether there might be items inside or not, a chair is really seen best and regarded best by a person sitting in it, because chair and sitter suit one another. Thus the individual areas of a chair are given names corresponding to the elements of a human form: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the primary purpose of a chair is to support the human body, its worth is valued basically on how suitably it measures up to this practical function. Within the construction of a chair, the maker is limited under some static rules and principal measurements. Under these regulations, however, the chair creator has awesome freedom.
The history of the chair lasted over a period of several thousand years. There existed civilizations that had made significant chair shapes, as expressions of the highest endeavour in the industries of craft and creativity. Among these societies, special mention needs to be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the reigns of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the items of skilled scheme, are today found from tomb findings. One of these is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The original Egyptian chair had four legs crafted not unlike those of some animal, a curved seat, and with a sloping back supported from vertical stretchers. In this design a solid triangular design was made. There was apparently no marked difference from the construction of Egyptian thrones and chairs for regular people. The only difference exists in the complexity of ornamentation, in the evidence of pricier inlays. The Egyptian folding stool most probably was crafted to be an easily carried seat for army soldiers. As a camp stool that chair persevered til much later points in time. But the stool then also was created for the task of a ceremonial seat, its original role as a folding stool simply forgotten. This can already be noted, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, formed in ebony with ivory inlay decoration and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They are made in the structure of folding stools but cannot be folded as the seats were worked from wood. The simple build of the folding stool, composed of two frames that spin on metal bolts and support a seat of leather or fabric held between them, came again at some time later in the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The best recognised of these is the folding stool, from ashwood, which is now found at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The significant Greek chair, the klismos, is recognised not from any ancient object still existing but from a large amount of pictorial evidence. The most well known is the klismos posited on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial place outside Athens (c. 410 BC). The klismos is a chair with a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, only two of these legs could be displayed. These curved legs were possibly crafted of bent wood and were probably had to bear a large amount of pressure from the weight of the sitter. The joints attaching the legs to the frame of the seat would have had to be therefore extremely strong and were visibly drawn.
The Romans emulated the Greek design; evidence of statues of seated Romans show examples of a more heavyset and are a slightly more crudely built klismos. Both styles, light and heavy, were seen again in the Classicist time. The klismos design is used in French Empire furniture, in English Regency, and in special kinds of notable originality around Denmark and Sweden during 1800.
China
The history of the chair in China is not able to be charted as far as the ancestry of the chair in Egypt and Greece. From the time of the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an unbroken collection of images and artworks was preserved, with images of the interiors and exteriors of Chinese households and the furniture. Preserved also from the 16th century are a trove of chairs constructed from wood or lacquered wood, that bear an astonishing resemblance to pictures of past chairs.
As was the case in Egypt, there existed two iconic chair forms in China: a chair of four legs and a folding stool. This four-legged chair has been found both with or without arms but always having its square seat and straight stiles (straight side supports) to give support to the back. In one image, it must be said, the stiles are lightly curved over the arms for the purpose of conform correctly to the form of the S-shaped back splat (the central upright of a chairback). Together, the three limbs had been mortised into the yoke-like top rail. Though the idea of a back splat had a foundation for English chairs of the Queen Anne period, wooden items that merely to a particular extent stabilise corner joints (and furthermore are loose as a result) are a signature exclusive to Chinese chairs. The four legs sit through the seat frame, which closes around the rounded staves. Every member is round in section or possesses rounded edges—referable perhaps to the bamboo tradition. The seat is not comfortable and had on occasion a plaited texture. These chairs needed the sitter to stay stiff and upright; for if too much weight is exerted on the back, the chair has a tendency to collapse. In patriarchal Chinese houses of this epoch armchairs likely were kept only for elderly individuals in the family, for they were held in great esteem.
The Chinese folding stool is presumed to have been brought to China from the West. It does not differ that much from the Egyptian and Scandinavian folding stools, but it possesses a dissimilarity in that the top rail is intricately affixed to the two legs of the stool by means of a curved member, which is generally possessing metal mounts. From a Western point of view the resultant effect of these furniture designs is stylized. The constructive and decoration aspects are combined in a style that is all at once both naïve and refined. The piecemeal appearance is an upshot of the way that the individual parts do not look to have been joined together with either glue or screws, but are mortised into one another and fixed in position in the style of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain in the 17th century also put its name on the chair. Artworks project a style of chair with a relatively brusque wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, having only two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing in between, stitched to bring out a pattern of little pads. The front board and a corresponding board from the back could be folded after loosening some small iron hooks. Thus the chair was a portable piece of furniture while traveling which, during the same era, granted the status of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered style of chair can be evidenced in engravings of the interiors of rich Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, and also in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. Though this type of chair can also be found in countries in which Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won acclaim, it is not certain that the style actually was born in The Netherlands. Usually, the legs of the chair are smooth, round in section, and of thin shape; they are sometimes baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is clearly a bourgeois piece of furniture and was made in considerable numbers, as evidenced from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which there is a whole row of those chairs lined up by a wall. The design asserts itself by its elegant proportions and fine upholstery in gilt leather or fabric edged with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature of forms—that is to say, as brought out in Paris around 1750—disseminated over most of Europe and has been imitated or copied in the mid-20th century. The chair owes this popularity to a combination of leisure and charm. The seat adheres to the human body and allows a relaxed sitting position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Usually the seat and back are upholstered, and there are tiny upholstered pads over the armrests. Smooth transitions achieved between seat frame, legs, and back conceal all the joints, which are solidly constructed on craftsmanlike methodology even with the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of those are constructed from wood of fairly thick dimensions; but all members are deeply molded, all extra wood has been taken away, and more upmarket examples may be further embellished with highly delicate and decorative engraving. The wood can be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry is usually used for the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; cane is in some cases used as an alternative to upholstery.
English chairs of the 18th century were more differentiated in form than the French. The French preference for stylistic uniformity, which came from the most distinguished circles in Paris and Versailles through most of France and found favour in many parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became commonly known and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
Within the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper brands of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, purport that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on office storage in Melbourne contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.