Of all furniture items, the chair might be the most imperative. While many other pieces (save the bed) are intended to support objects, the chair supports your human form. The term chair must be used here in the most common sense, from stool to throne to developed makes such as the bench or sofa, which can be considered as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not overtly distinuishable.
The social history of the chair is as curious as its history as an art and craft. The chair is not simply a physical support and aesthetic item; it historically is a signifier of social place. At the historical royal courts there were important signifiers between sitting on a chair with arms, or a chair with a back but without arms, and having to utilise a stool. From the 20th century, the director’s and manager’s chair has developed an indicator of superior status, as well as in democratic government debate the speaker sits on a raised platform.
As a furniture form, the chair ranges from a range of different models. There are chairs created to match man’s age and physical form (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to denote his rank in society (the executive chair, the throne). Since the olden days there were chairs for birthing (birth chairs); from the 20th century, there have been chairs used to die in (the electric chair). We design chairs with one, two, three, or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. There are chairs that can be folded and put away, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Modern living has derived new chairs for use in automobiles and aircraft. Each of these chair forms have perfected to conform to evolving human needs. Because of its particular relationship with man, the chair lives to its full advantage only when used. Though it doesn’t make a difference to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a dresser drawers if there are items inside or not, a chair is really understood and judged by a person sitting on it, because chair and sitter suit one another. Thus the different limbs of the chair were given labels as the limbs of the human form: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the principal function of the chair is to support a human body, its worth is valued principally by how well it does measure up to this practical purpose. Within the structure of the chair, the maker is restricted within the static regulation and principal measurements. Inside these boundaries, however, the chair builder has marvellous freedom.
The history of the chair covers an epoch of several thousand years. There are civilizations that had significant chair forms, seen of the topmost task in the industries of handling and design. From such societies, particular note needs to be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the lives of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the items of expert design, were seen from findings made in tombs. One of the two is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The original Egyptian chair had four legs structured like those of an animal, a curved seat, with a sloping back supported with vertical stretchers. In this design a strong triangular construction was created. There was to all appearances no notable difference in the structure of Egyptian thrones and chairs for typical citizens. The real variation lies in the type of ornamentation, in the particulars of more expensive inlays. The Egyptian folding stool in all likelihood was created to be an easily packed seat for army officers. As a camp stool the chair stayed around til much later points. But the stool then was created for the role of a ceremonial seat, its technical function as a folding stool fast forgotten. This can already be seen, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, created in ebony with ivory inlay work and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They are in the form of folding stools but cannot be folded because the seats are formed out of wood. The simplistic make of the folding stool, made of two frames that rotate on metal bolts and bear a seat of leather or fabric fastened between them, is seen again but somewhat later from the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The most well known of this type is the folding stool, made of ashwood, now found at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The typical Greek chair, the klismos, is found not from any ancient object still extant but seen in a variety of pictorial evidence. The most recognisable is the klismos displayed on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial area near Athens (c. 410 BC). The klismos is a chair with a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, only two of these legs could be displayed. These unique legs were understood to be executed from bent wood and were likely to have been subjected to great pressure under the weight of the sitter. The joints attaching the legs to the frame of the seat are therefore very stable and were plainly indicated.
The Romans embued the Greek chair; some casts of seated Romans show examples of a thicker and are a slightly crudely built klismos. Both types, light or heavy, were revived in the Classicist period. The klismos influence is evidenced in French Empire design, in English Regency, and in some kinds of marked individuality in Denmark and Sweden from 1800.
China
The progression of the chair in China cannot be followed as far back as the progression of the chair in Egypt and Greece. Since the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an unscathed series of sketches and works of art had been kept, showing the insides and exterior of Chinese households and the furniture. Kept also from the 16th century are a number of chairs made from wood or lacquered wood, that bear an amazing resemblance to styles of previous chairs.
Just like in Egypt, two particular chair forms existed in China: a chair of four legs and a folding stool. This four-legged chair is designed both with or without arms however always having its square seat and straight stiles (standing side supports) to support the back. In one form, it has been found, the stiles are lightly curved over the arms in order to suit the angle of the S-shaped back splat (the basic upright of a back). All three limbs had been mortised onto the yoke-like top rail. Though the style of this back splat then had an introduction for English chairs of the Queen Anne period, wooden sections that would merely to a limited ability support corner joints (and are loose as a result) are a feature exclusive to Chinese chairs. The four legs are set through the seat frame, which finishes around the rounded staves. Members are round in section or possesses rounded edges—references perhaps to the bamboo tradition. The seat is not pleasant and might have had a plaited bottom. These chairs demanded of the sitter to be stiff and upright; for if too much pressure is placed on the back, the chair has a tendency to fall. In patriarchal Chinese homes of this epoch armchairs most likely were kept only for senior persons, for they were esteemed greatly.
The Chinese folding stool is thought to have come to China from the West. It does not vary very much from the Egyptian or Scandinavian folding stools, but it possesses a change in that the top rail is delicately affixed to the two legs of the stool with a curved member, which is generally provided with metal mounts. From a Western point of view the ultimate effect of these furniture designs is stylized. The construction and aesthetic elements are combined in a way that is all at once naïve and refined. The piecemeal appearance is an outcome of the fact that the individual parts do not look to have been joined together with either glue or screws, but have been mortised into one another and fixed in its place in the manner of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain in the 17th century also put its name on the chair. Artworks project a style of chair with a relatively brusque wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, possessing two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing in the layers, stitched to produce a pattern of little pads. The front board and a related board in the back could be folded after loosening some small iron hooks. Therefore the chair was an easily portable piece of furniture for traveling which, during the same time, gave the dignity of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered style of chair is seen in engravings of the interior of affluent Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, and in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. Although this type of chair might also be found in countries in which Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won acclaim, it is not certain that the style actually was born in The Netherlands. Generally, the legs of the chair are smooth, round in section, and of slender shape; they are in some cases baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is obviously a bourgeois piece of furniture and was crafted in large quantities, as can be surmised from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which an entire row of those chairs lined up along a wall. The design asserts itself by its harmonious proportions and delicate upholstery in gilt leather or fabric edged with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature style—that was, to say, as developed in Paris around 1750—disseminated through most of Europe and was imitated or copied during the mid-20th century. The model owes such popularity to a combination of comfort and delicacy. The seat adheres to the human body and allows a relaxed seated position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Generally the seat and back are upholstered, and there are little upholstered pads on the armrests. Smooth transitions made between seat frame, legs, and back disguise all the joints, which are strongly constructed on craftsmanlike methods despite the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations thereof are made from wood of quite thick density; but all the members are deeply molded, all superfluous wood has been taken away, and more expensive items can be further embellished with highly delicate and decorative woodwork. The wood could be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry may be used for any upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; cane is in some cases used as an alternative to upholstery.
English chairs from the 18th century were more variable in form than the French. The French taste for stylistic uniformity, which lead from the most distinguished circles in Paris and Versailles through most of France and became the preference in several parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became reknowned and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
During the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper products of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, hint that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on reception desks in Brisbane contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.