From each of the furniture pieces, the chair may be the primary one. While the majority of other pieces (save the bed) are created to support objects, the chair supports the human form. The term chair is intended to be said here in the largest sense, from stool to throne to complex forms including a bench and sofa, which may be considered as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not clearly labeled.
The social history of the chair is as interesting as its history as a creative craft. The chair is not just a physical support or aesthetic piece; it historically was a symbol of social status. At the past royal courts there were clear signifiers between having a chair with arms, on a chair with a back but no arms, and having to use a stool. In the recent century, the director’s and/or manager’s chair has been an indicator of superior position, and even in democratic parliaments the speaker sits on a high-set level.
In its furniture creation, the chair encompasses a number of variations. There are chairs structured to suit man’s age and physical condition (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to denote his rank in society (the executive chair, the throne). Since historical days there were chairs to be born in (birth chairs); in the 20th century, there have been chairs used for ending life (the electric chair). We have chairs with one, two, three, and/or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We make chairs that can be folded for easy storage, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Our contemporary lifestyle has developed new chairs for automobiles and aircraft. Each and every one of these chair kinds has changed to suit to differing human needs. For its unique link with man, the chair exists to its full significance only when in use. Whereas it doesn’t make any difference to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a chest of drawers if there is anything inside or not, a chair is really understood and fairly judged by a person using it, for chair and sitter complement the other. Thus the various limbs of a chair were labeled as the areas of a human parts: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the basic purpose of the chair is to support the human body, its credit is valued basically from how well it fulfills this practical role. In the build of the chair, the designer is limited with some static regulations and principal measurements. Through these limits, however, the chair designer has awesome freedom.
The history of the chair lasts over an era of several thousand years. There were civilizations that made individual chair types, expressions of the principal endeavour in the arenas of technique and art. From those cultures, particular note must be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the lifetimes of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the items of expert craft, are now seen from discoveries made in tombs. The first one of the two is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The iconic Egyptian chair would have had four legs crafted not unlike those of a designated animal, a curved seat, and with a sloping back supported from vertical stretchers. From this design a durable triangular structure was made. There was from our understanding no notable differentiation from the design of Egyptian thrones and chairs for typical people. The general difference exists in the brand of ornamentation, in the evidence of more costly inlays. The Egyptian folding stool probably was created for an easily carried seat for army soldiers. As a camp stool the type stayed til much later times. But the stool then also was made as the use of a ceremonial seat, its mechanical job as a folding stool being forgotten. This can now be noted, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, formed in ebony with ivory inlay decoration and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They were constructed in the form of folding stools but are not able to be folded because the seats are formed from wood. The plain structure of the folding stool, consisting of two frames that cycle on metal bolts and have a seat of leather or fabric held between them, reappears somewhat later in the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The most recognised of those is the folding stool, from ashwood, which is now seen at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The iconic Greek chair, the klismos, is known not with any ancient fossil still around but as seen from a variety of pictorial objects. The best recognised is the klismos placed on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial location outside Athens (c. 410 BC). This klismos is a chair with a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, but only two of which can be shown. These odd legs were likely to have been created of bent wood and were in that case needed to bear extreme pressure from the weight of the sitter. The joints fastening the legs to the frame of the seat are therefore extremely durable and were clearly pointed out.
The Romans embued the Greek style; quite a few statues of seated Romans show chairs of a thicker and apparently kind of less intricately crafted klismos. Both kinds, light or heavy, were popularised in the Classicist epoch. The klismos influence is evidenced in French Empire furniture, in English Regency, and in some particular forms of marked individuality in Denmark and Sweden during 1800.
China
The ancestry of the chair in China isn’t able to be charted as well as in Egypt and Greece. From the time of the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an unscathed serial of images and works of art has been preserved, with images of the insides and exteriors of Chinese houses and the furniture. Preserved also since the 16th century are a number of chairs crafted from wood or lacquered wood, that show an astonishing similarity to representations of previous chairs.
Just like in Egypt, there existed two particular chair designs in China: a chair having four legs and a folding stool. This four-legged chair can be constructed both with or without arms but always with a square seat and straight stiles (standing side supports) to firm the back. In one type, however, the stiles had been delicately curved by the arms to conform correctly to the structure of the S-shaped back splat (the centre upright of a chairback). Each of the three limbs were mortised on the yoke-like top rail. Despite that the idea of the back splat later had a foundation for English chairs during the Queen Anne period, wooden sections that would merely to a limited extent embolden corner joints (and were loose in the bargain) represent a feature exclusive to Chinese chairs. The four legs pass through the seat frame, which stops around the rounded staves. Members are round in section or is given rounded edges—referable as may be to the bamboo tradition. The seat is not comfortable and occasionally had a plaited texture. These chairs required of the sitter to stay stiff and upright; for if too much pressure is pushed on the back, the chair has a habit of falling over. In patriarchal Chinese houses of this period armchairs presumably were reserved only for the senior persons, for they were esteemed greatly.
The Chinese folding stool is understood to have taken to China from the West. It does not vary much from the Egyptian or Scandinavian folding stools, but it has a change in that the top rail is elegantly fixed to the two legs of the stool by using a curved member, which is often provided with metal mounts. From a Western perspective the resultant effect of these two furniture designs is stylized. The construction and aesthetic aspects are combined in a way that is all at once naïve and refined. The pieced-together appearance is an upshot of the fact that the individual parts do not appear to have been fixed by means of either glue or screws, but were mortised into one another and locked into place in the style of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain during the 17th century also had its name on the chair. Paintings show a type of chair with a relatively brusque wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, having only two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing in between the layers, stitched to produce a pattern of tiny pads. The front board and a similar board at the back could be folded after unscrewing some little iron hooks. Therefore the chair was a portable piece of furniture in traveling which, at the same period, held the dignity of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered kind of chair is found in engravings of the inside of affluent Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, and in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. Though this type of chair might also be made in countries in which Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won preference, it is not decided that the design actually was born in The Netherlands. Generally, the legs of the chair are smooth, round in section, and of thin shape; they are in some cases baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is unquestionably a bourgeois piece of furniture and was produced in large numbers, as evidenced from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which a whole row of those chairs lined up along a wall. The design asserts itself by its harmonious proportions and fine upholstery in gilt leather or fabric bordered with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature form—that is, as progressed in Paris around 1750—disseminated over most of Europe and was imitated or copied in the mid-20th century. The style owes this popularity to a combination of leisure and elegance. The seat suits to the human body and grants a relaxed sitting position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Typically the seat and back are upholstered, and there are tiny upholstered pads on the armrests. Smooth transitions are found between seat frame, legs, and back conceal all the joints, which are stable, constructed on craftsmanlike methodology in spite of the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of them use wood of quite thick density; but all the members are deeply molded, all extraneous wood has been taken away, and more expensive items can be further embellished with highly delicate and decorative engraving. The wood may be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry should be used for all of the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; crosshatched cane is in some cases used in place of upholstery.
English chairs in the 18th century were more differentiated in style than the French. The French touch for stylistic uniformity, which spread from the aristocratic circles in Paris and Versailles over most of France and was popularised in many parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became well-known and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
In the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper products of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, suggest that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on office chairs in Melbourne contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.