Out of each of the furniture pieces, the chair could be the most imperative. While many other items (except the bed) are intended to support objects, the chair supports your human form. The term chair was regarded here in the larger sense, from stool to throne to complex kinds like the bench or sofa, which may be viewed as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not obviously labeled.
The social history of the chair is as interesting as its history as a creative art. The chair is not only a physical support and aesthetic artwork; it was historically symbolic of social ranking. At the historical royal courts there were important differences between possessing a chair with arms, or a chair with a back but without arms, and having to use a stool. Since the 20th century, a director’s and/or manager’s chair has become an identifier of superior dignity, as well as in democratic parliaments the speaker sits on a higher floor.
As its furniture construction, the chair is utilised for a variety of different purposes. There are chairs created to fit man’s age and physical abilities (the high chair, the wheelchair) and for his position in society (the executive chair, the throne). During historical days there were chairs for birthing (birth chairs); from the 20th century, there have been chairs used for ending life (the electric chair). We make chairs with one, two, three, and/or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We can make chairs that can be folded up, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Modern day living has derived particular chairs for automobiles and aircraft. All these chair kinds has adapted to fit to differing human requirements. For its close relationship with man, the chair appears to its full importance only when used. While it is not relevant to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a bureau whether there might be items inside or not, a chair is really seen best and clearly evaluated with a person sitting in it, for chair and sitter suit each other. Thus the individual limbs of a chair were labeled likened to the areas of the human shape: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the basic job of your chair is to support our body, its credit is evaluated primarily from how suitably it measures up to this practical function. In the design of the chair, the chair maker is limited for some static law and principal measurements. Within these limitations, however, the chair designer has great freedom.
The history of the chair covered an era of several thousand years. There existed cultures that held iconic chair forms, as expressive of the foremost craft in the industries of skill and creativity. In those civilisations, individual note can be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the ascendancy of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the upshot of masterful scheme, were seen from tomb discoveries. The first of these is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The typical Egyptian chair has four legs structured as akin to those of a particular animal, a curved seat, with a sloping back supported by vertical stretchers. From this a strong triangular design was created. There was apparently no noteworthy variation between the creation of Egyptian thrones and chairs for ordinary non-royals. The simple difference existed in the intricacy of its ornamentation, in the selection of costly inlays. The Egyptian folding stool in all likelihood was designed for an easily packed seat for army. As a camp stool this stool existed until much later points. But the stool also then existed in the role of a ceremonial seat, its mechanical history as a folding stool simply forgotten. This can now be found, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, created in ebony with ivory inlay work and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They were made in the structure of folding stools but cannot be folded because the seats are worked out of wood. The easy structure of the folding stool, consisting of two frames that turn on metal bolts and have a seat of leather or fabric fastened between them, appeared again some time later in the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The most well known of this type is the folding stool, made out of ashwood, which is now at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The unique Greek chair, the klismos, is found not from any ancient item still existing but seen in a large amount of pictorial evidence. The best known is the klismos seen on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial location just out of Athens (c. 410 BC). The klismos is a chair with a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, only two of them can be visible. These strange legs were understood to be crafted of bent wood and were therefore put under great pressure from the weight of the sitter. The joints attaching the legs to the frame of the seat had to be therefore extremely strong and were plainly pointed out.
The Romans borrowed from the Greek designs; designs of models of seated Romans are examples of a heavier and which appear to be a somewhat crudely constructed klismos. Both types, the light or the heavy, were revived within the Classicist period. The klismos style is used in French Empire chairs, in English Regency, and in particular brands of considerable individuality within Denmark and Sweden during 1800.
China
The progression of the chair in China isn’t able to be tracked as long as chairs in Egypt and Greece. Since the time of the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an unbroken folio of images and works of art was kept, showing the interior and outside of Chinese homes and their furniture. Preserved also since the 16th century are a trove of chairs constructed of wood or lacquered wood, that display an astonishing resemblance to styles of ancient chairs.
Just as in Egypt, there existed two iconic chair forms in China: a chair that had four legs and a folding stool. This four-legged chair was designed both with or without arms but always with a square seat and straight stiles (vertical side supports) to support the back. In one style, though, the stiles had been delicately curved above the arms to sit correctly with the form of the S-shaped back splat (the main upright of a chairback). Together, the three areas had been mortised onto the yoke-like top rail. Although the design of a back splat later had a foundation for English chairs from the Queen Anne period, wooden sections that could merely to a limited extent stabilise corner joints (and were loose into the bargain) indicate a design exclusive to Chinese chairs. The four legs sit through the seat frame, which closes around the rounded staves. Members are round in section or has rounded edges—references as may be to the bamboo tradition. The seat is not pleasant and may have had a plaited seat. These chairs required the sitter to hold themselves stiff and upright; if too much pressure is exerted on the back, the chair has a habit of falling over. In patriarchal Chinese houses of this epoch armchairs probably were only for senior family members, for they were held in great respect.
The Chinese folding stool is thought to have come to China from the West. It is akin that much from the Egyptian and Scandinavian folding stools, but it has a dissimilarity in that the top rail is elegantly held to the two legs of the stool by using a curved member, which is usually possessing metal mounts. From a Western point of view the ultimate effect of both these furniture designs is stylized. The structure and decoration elements are combined in a style that is all at once both naïve and refined. The patched up appearance is an outcome of the way that the individual parts do not seem to have been held together with either glue or screws, but had been mortised into one another and fixed in place in the manner of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain during the 17th century also put its signature on the chair. Artworks show a kind of chair with a relatively crude wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, with two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing between the layers, stitched to show up a pattern of small pads. The front board and a similar board at the back could be folded after loosening some tiny iron hooks. Therefore the chair was an easily portable piece of furniture for traveling which, in the same period, gave the dignity of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered type of chair is found in engravings of the interior of wealthy Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, and in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. Although this type of chair can also be made in countries where Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won acclaim, it is not certain that the style actually began in The Netherlands. Normally, the legs of the chair are smooth, round in section, and of thin measurements; they are in some cases baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is obviously a bourgeois piece of furniture and was made in impressive amounts, as can be seen from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which an entire row of those chairs lined up by a wall. The design asserts itself by virtue of its harmonious proportions and delicate upholstery in gilt leather or fabric edged with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature style—that was, as created in Paris around 1750—spread over most of Europe and was imitated or copied into the mid-20th century. The design owes its popularity to a combination of leisure and charm. The seat suits to the human body and grants a relaxed seated position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Generally the seat and back are upholstered, and there are small upholstered pads covering the armrests. Smooth transitions achieved between seat frame, legs, and back cover all the joints, which are stable, constructed on craftsmanlike principles despite the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of those employ wood of rather thick measurements; but all members are deeply molded, all extra wood has been sanded away, and more expensive designs might be further embellished with special delicate and decorative carving. The wood can be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry is often used for the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; cane is in some cases used as an alternative to upholstery.
English chairs in the 18th century were more differentiated in design than the French. The French manner for stylistic uniformity, which came from the royal circles in Paris and Versailles within most of France and won favour in large parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became commonly known and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
In the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper versions of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, suggest that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on office storage in Melbourne contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.