From each of the furniture forms, the chair might be of most importance. While most other items (except the bed) are intended to support objects, the chair supports our human form. The term chair can be used here in the larger sense, from stool to throne to complex pieces including the bench and sofa, which can be looked upon as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not obviously labeled.
The social history of the chair is as interesting as its history as a creative art. The chair is not just a physical support and/or an aesthetic craft; it can also be an indicator of social rank. In the old royal courts there were significant connotations between being led to a chair with arms, or a chair with a back but no arms, or having to sit on a stool. During the 20th century, the director’s and/or manager’s chair has become an identifier of superior status, like in democratic parliaments the speaker sits on a higher floor.
In a furniture creation, the chair can be utilised for a range of different models. There are chairs manufactured to suit man’s age and physical capabilities (the high chair, the wheelchair) and for his position in society (the executive chair, the throne). During historical times there were chairs used for birthing (birth chairs); since the 20th century, there have been chairs for ending life (the electric chair). We have chairs with one, two, three, and four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We can make chairs that can be folded and put away, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Modern day living has designated particular chairs for use in automobiles and aircraft. All these chair kinds have perfected to suit to changing human uses. Because of its close connection with man, the chair lives to its full purpose only when used. Whereas it doesn’t make any difference to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a dresser drawers whether there are items inside or not, a chair is really seen and judged best with a person utilising it, for chair and sitter require one another. Thus the various parts of a chair have been given names corresponding to the areas of our human body: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the elemental job of the chair is to support a human body, its credit is judged basically by how fully it does measure up to this practical role. In the creation of a chair, the carpenter is limited within some static rules and principal measurements. Through these rules, however, the chair builder has large freedom.
The history of the chair extends over an era of several thousand years. There existed cultures that held distinctive chair types, as expressive of the leading task in the areas of handling and art. In those civilisations, particular mention must be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the reigns of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the result of careful design, are now a finding from findings made in tombs. The first one of the two is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The typical Egyptian chair would have four legs structured similar to those of a designated animal, a curved seat, and a sloping back supported from vertical stretchers. From this a durable triangular form was obtained. There was from our knowledge no significant difference between the construction of Egyptian thrones and chairs for regular non-royals. The simple variation lies in the type of ornamentation, in the selection of pricey inlays. The Egyptian folding stool in all likelihood was crafted for an easily stored seat for army soldiers. As a camp stool this type stayed until much later days. But the stool also then played the use of a ceremonial seat, its original job as a folding stool ignored or forgotten. This can from today be observed, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, created in ebony with ivory inlay decoration and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They are constructed in the construction of folding stools but are not able to be folded as the seats are formed of wood. The plain build of the folding stool, made of two frames that cycle on metal bolts and bear a seat of leather or fabric held between them, is seen at some time later in the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The best known of this form is the folding stool, made from ashwood, now found at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The typical Greek chair, the klismos, is known not from any ancient specimen still in form but found in a wealth of pictorial items. The most well known is the klismos placed on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial place just out of Athens (c. 410 BC). The klismos is a chair that had a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, only two of these legs are displayed. These odd legs were considered to be created with bent wood and were in that case subjected to huge pressure under the weight of the sitter. The joints fastening the legs to the frame of the seat would have been therefore super solid and were overtly indicated.
The Romans embued the Greek chair; existing statues of seated Romans offer evidence of a thicker and in appearance kind of more crudely designed klismos. Both types, the light and heavy, were revived during the Classicist time. The klismos style is found in French Empire styles, in English Regency, and in some particular forms of notable uniqueness of Denmark and Sweden from 1800.
China
The past of the chair in China can not be tracked as well as the ancestry of chairs in Egypt and Greece. From the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an unscathed collection of images and artworks has been preserved, with images of the inside and exteriors of Chinese households and the designs of furniture. Also preserved since the 16th century are a collection of chairs constructed of wood or lacquered wood, that bear an intriguing likeness to pictures of past chairs.
Same as in Egypt, there were two standard chair forms in China: a chair of four legs and a folding stool. That chair can be constructed both with and without arms however never missing a square seat and straight stiles (upright side supports) to support the back. In one style, though, the stiles were slightly curved above the arms to sit right with the shape of the S-shaped back splat (the main upright of a back). Together, the three parts had been mortised in the yoke-like top rail. Despite that the idea of this back splat exercised a foundation for English chairs within the Queen Anne period, wooden members that could merely to a limited limit reinforce corner joints (and then are loose to top that off) indicate a design solely to Chinese chairs. The four legs are set through the seat frame, which ends over the rounded staves. Members are round in section or have rounded edges—references as may be to the bamboo tradition. The seat is uncomfortable and occasionally had a plaited texture. These chairs required the sitter to stay stiff and upright; for when too much weight is exerted on the back, the chair has a way of toppling over. In patriarchal Chinese households of this period armchairs presumably were kept for the senior persons in the family, for they were held in great esteem.
The Chinese folding stool is understood to have taken to China from the West. It does not differ that much from the Egyptian or Scandinavian folding stools, but it possesses a change in that the top rail is prettily affixed to the two legs of the stool by use of a curved member, which is usually designed with metal mounts. From a Western understanding the resulting effect of these two furniture forms is stylized. The constructive and aesthetic issues are combined in a manner that is at the same time naïve and refined. The patchwork appearance is a result of the manner that the individual parts do not appear to have been constructed by either glue or screws, but were mortised with one another and held in place in the style of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain in the 17th century also put its mark on the chair. Works of art show a style of chair with a relatively brusque wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, consisting of two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing in the layers, stitched to bring out a pattern of little pads. The front board and a related board in the back could be folded after loosening some tiny iron hooks. In this way the chair was a portable piece of furniture in traveling which, at the same era, held the status of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered style of chair is seen in engravings of the interiors of wealthy Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, and in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. Though this type of chair can also be seen in countries where Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won critical acclaim, it is not certain that the innovation actually began in The Netherlands. Generally, the legs of the chair are smooth, round in section, and of slim dimensions; they are in some cases baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is patently a bourgeois piece of furniture and was manufactured in large quantities, as can be seen from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which a whole row of these chairs lined up against a wall. The form asserts itself by its shapely proportions and expensive upholstery in gilt leather or fabric bordered with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature form—that was, to say, as developed in Paris around 1750—spread over most of Europe and has been imitated or copied in the mid-20th century. The model owes the popularity to a combination of comfort and delicacy. The seat conforms to the human body and permits a relaxed sitting position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Generally the seat and back are upholstered, and there are tiny upholstered pads over the armrests. Smooth transitions are made between seat frame, legs, and back cover all the joints, which are constructed solidly on craftsmanlike principles despite the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of them employ wood of rather thick density; but every member is deeply molded, all superfluous wood has been cut away, and more expensive chairs might be further embellished with special delicate and decorative engraving. The wood can be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry is usually used for the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; crosshatched cane is sometimes used as an alternative to upholstery.
English chairs from the 18th century were more open in design than the French. The French taste for stylistic uniformity, which came from the highest circles in Paris and Versailles within most of France and found favour in several parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became popular and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
Within the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper styles of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, suggest that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on executive furniture in Melbourne contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.