Out of each of the furniture items, the chair may be of most importance. While most other forms (apart from the bed) are devised to support objects, the chair supports a human form. The term chair can be viewed here in the common sense, from stool to throne to derivative forms including a bench and sofa, which should be looked upon as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not evidently labeled.
The social history of the chair is as interesting as its history as a creative art. The chair is not simply a physical support and aesthetic item; it is also a symbol of social place. Within the historical royal courts there were significant signifiers between sitting on a chair with arms, or a chair with a back but no arms, and having to use a stool. In the recent century, a director’s and manager’s chair has been an identifier of superior standing, and in democratic government meeting the speaker sits on an elevated floor.
As its furniture purpose, the chair is used for a variety of variations. There are chairs designed to attend to man’s age and physical form (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to indicate his rank in society (the executive chair, the throne). During the olden days there were chairs used for birth (birth chairs); during the 20th century, there have been chairs used to die in (the electric chair). We design chairs with one, two, three, and four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We can make chairs that can be folded, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Modern living has derived particular chairs for automobiles and aircraft. Every one of these chair types has been perfected to match to growing human needs. For its significant connection with man, the chair exists to its full importance only when used. Whereas it makes no difference to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a dresser drawers if there might be items inside or not, a chair is really seen and judged with a person sitting on it, because chair and sitter need one another. Thus the individual parts of a chair are labeled as the names of a human parts: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the simple role of the chair is to support our body, its worth is evaluated generally for how suitably it does measure up to this practical use. In the manufacture of a chair, the builder is restricted with some static rules and principal measurements. Under these restrictions, however, the chair maker has large freedom.
The history of the chair extended over dates of several thousand years. There is evidence of peoples that created distinctive chair shapes, seen of the highest work in the industries of handling and aesthetics. In those peoples, a note must be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the reigns of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the objects of expert scheme, are today known from tombs. The first one of these is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The iconic Egyptian chair would have four legs crafted similar to those of a chosen animal, a curved seat, and with a sloping back supported from vertical stretchers. In this way a strong triangular design was created. There was in our knowledge no notable variation from the structure of Egyptian thrones and chairs for typical non-royals. The main difference lies in the brand of ornamentation, in the evidence of pricey inlays. The Egyptian folding stool most likely was crafted for an easily packed seat for officers. As a camp stool the form persisted til much later days. But the stool also was designed as the task of a ceremonial seat, its technical role as a folding stool fast forgotten. This can from evidence be seen, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, created in ebony with ivory inlay ornamentation and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They were made in the construction of folding stools but are not able to be folded because the seats are formed from wood. The plain structure of the folding stool, consisting of two frames that spin on metal bolts and hold a seat of leather or fabric set between them, then came up but some time later as the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The most recognised of those is the folding stool, made out of ashwood, which can now be found at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The iconic Greek chair, the klismos, is found not as any ancient fossil still in form but in a wealth of pictorial evidence. The better recognised is the klismos drawn on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial area by Athens (c. 410 BC). This klismos is a chair with a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, but only two of those legs are seen. These unique legs were thought to be created of bent wood and were in that case put under extreme pressure from the weight of the sitter. The joints securing the legs to the frame of the seat are therefore extremely stable and were plainly signified.
The Romans borrowed from the Greek chair; quite a few casts of seated Romans offer chairs of a more heavyset and apparently kind of less intricately constructed klismos. Both designs, the light or heavy, were popularised during the Classicist time. The klismos style is used in French Empire styles, in English Regency, and in some particular kinds of notable uniqueness in Denmark and Sweden circa 1800.
China
The progression of the chair in China can not be traced as long as in Egypt and Greece. From the time of the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an unscathed folio of images and artworks was kept, displaying the insides and outside of Chinese households and the furniture. Kept also from the 16th century are some chairs crafted from wood or lacquered wood, that bear an amazing likeness to images of older chairs.
Same as in Egypt, there were two particular chair designs in China: a chair having four legs and a folding stool. This chair can be constructed both with or without arms but always having its square seat and straight stiles (standing side supports) to give support to the back. In one design, however, the stiles are slightly curved over the arms so as to sit correctly with the angle of the S-shaped back splat (the basic upright of a chairback). All three areas had been mortised into the yoke-like top rail. Despite that the idea of the back splat then had an introduction for English chairs from the Queen Anne period, wooden items that could only to a restricted ability support corner joints (and furthermore are loose as a result) indicate a design particular to Chinese chairs. The four legs are set through the seat frame, which closes about the rounded staves. Each member is round in section or has rounded edges—acknowledging maybe to the bamboo tradition. The seat is not pleasant and may have a plaited bottom. These chairs required of the sitter to stay stiff and upright; when too much weight is placed on the back, the chair has a habit of toppling over. In patriarchal Chinese households of this era armchairs probably were reserved for senior members of the family, for they were given great respect.
The Chinese folding stool is presumed to have travelled to China from the West. It does not differ so very much from the Egyptian or Scandinavian folding stools, but it possesses a change in that the top rail is delicately affixed to the two legs of the stool in a curved member, which is generally possessing metal mounts. From a Western viewpoint the resulting effect of these two furniture designs is stylized. The construction and decoration aspects are combined in a style that is all at once naïve and refined. The pieced-together appearance is an upshot of the fact that the individual items do not appear to have been constructed by either glue or screws, but have been mortised into one another and fixed in its place in the manner of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain in the 17th century also put its mark on the chair. Paintings project a design of chair with a relatively crude wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, consisting of two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing in the layers, stitched to produce a pattern of tiny pads. The front board and a related board from the back could be folded after loosening some small iron hooks. In this way the chair was a readily portable piece of furniture in traveling which, in the same period, granted the status of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered design of chair is displayed in engravings of the interiors of affluent Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, as well as in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. While this type of chair might also be found in countries where Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won preference, it is not certain that the form actually was instigated in The Netherlands. Usually, the legs of the chair will be smooth, round in section, and of slim shape; they are in some cases baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is unquestionably a bourgeois piece of furniture and was made in vast quantities, as evidenced from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which a whole row of this kind of chairs lined up by a wall. The style asserts itself by its harmonious proportions and fine upholstery in gilt leather or fabric bordered with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature style—that is, as brought out in Paris around 1750—spread over most of Europe and has been imitated or copied during the mid-20th century. The chair owes this popularity to a combination of relaxation and charm. The seat adheres to the human body and allows a relaxed seated position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Usually the seat and back are upholstered, and there are tiny upholstered pads covering the armrests. Smooth transitions are made between seat frame, legs, and back conceal all the joints, which are strongly constructed on craftsmanlike methods even with the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations thereof are made from wood of relatively thick measurements; but every member is deeply molded, all extraneous wood has been removed, and finer designs can be further embellished with highly delicate and decorative carvings. The wood may be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry is generally used for any upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; crosshatched cane is sometimes used in place of upholstery.
English chairs from the 18th century were more differentiated in style than the French. The French preference for stylistic uniformity, which disseminated from the aristocratic circles in Paris and Versailles over most of France and became the preference in several parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became popular and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
In the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper brands of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, indicate that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on office storage in Sydney contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.