From each of the furniture needs, the chair may be of most importance. While many other objects (save for the bed) are meant to support objects, the chair supports a human form. The term chair should be used here in the widest sense, from stool to throne to further makes including a bench and sofa, which can be looked upon as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not overtly labeled.
The social history of the chair is as curious as its history as a creative art. The chair is not merely a physical support and/or an aesthetic artwork; it is historically a signifier of social hierarchy. At the Medieval royal courts there were clear signifiers between possessing a chair with arms, or a chair with a back but no arms, or worse having to utilise a stool. Since the 20th century, a director’s and/or manager’s chair has been an identifier of superior standing, and even in democratic government meeting the speaker sits on an elevated platform.
In its furniture creation, the chair is employed for a number of variations. There are chairs designed to attend to man’s age and physical capabilities (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to denote his position in society (the executive chair, the throne). From historical days there were chairs to be born in (birth chairs); in the 20th century, there have been chairs used for ending life (the electric chair). We design chairs with one, two, three, and four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We can make chairs that can be folded, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Our contemporary lifestyle has designated unique chairs in automobiles and aircraft. All these chair types have been changed to fit to different human uses. Because of its significant connection with man, the chair comes to its full advantage only when being utilised. While it isn’t relevant to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a set of drawers whether there might be anything inside or not, a chair is understood best and fairly judged with a person sitting in it, because chair and sitter need the other. Thus the different areas of the chair have been given names corresponding to the elements of a human body: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the clear job of the chair is to support a body, its value is tested basically by how suitably it does fulfill this practical function. In the design of the chair, the builder is limited by certain static law and principal measurements. Under these limitations, however, the chair maker has awesome freedom.
The history of the chair was a period of several thousand years. There is evidence of civilizations that had made significant chair forms, as seen of the leading object in the spheres of skill and creativity. Among these such societies, special note should be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the ascendancy of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the objects of careful scheme, are now found from tombs. One of the two is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The typical Egyptian chair has four legs shaped like those of an animal, a curved seat, and a sloping back supported from vertical stretchers. In this design a strong triangular structure was created. There was to all appearances no notable differentiation in the construction of Egyptian thrones and chairs for ordinary non-royals. The main variation was in the complexity of ornamentation, in the particulars of more valuable inlays. The Egyptian folding stool in all probability was made as an easily packed seat for officers. As a camp stool this chair persisted for much later periods of time. But the stool also then played the use of a ceremonial seat, its technical role as a folding stool simply forgotten. This can from today be observed, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, created in ebony with ivory inlay ornamentation and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They are made in the structure of folding stools but can not be folded because the seats were worked out of wood. The easy construction of the folding stool, consisting of two frames that cycle on metal bolts and have a seat of leather or fabric set between them, reappeared but some time later in the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The better known of this type is the folding stool, made out of ashwood, which is now at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The archetypal Greek chair, the klismos, is seen not from any ancient item still existing but as found in a trove of pictorial objects. The best known is the klismos drawn on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial ground just out of Athens (c. 410 BC). The klismos is a chair that had a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, but only two of which are seen. These creative legs were probably crafted in bent wood and were therefore put under huge pressure under the weight of the sitter. The joints fastening the legs to the frame of the seat were therefore super durable and were clearly indicated.
The Romans adopted the Greek chair; some casts of seated Romans display evidence of a thicker and which appear to be a kind of more crudely designed klismos. Both designs, the light and the heavy, were popularised during the Classicist epoch. The klismos design can be evidenced in French Empire design, in English Regency, and in special kinds of profound iconicism around Denmark and Sweden during 1800.
China
The ancestry of the chair in China is not able to be tracked as far back as the history of chairs in Egypt and Greece. Since the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an unscathed folio of drawings and paintings was protected, displaying the interior and exterior of Chinese households and the designs of furniture. Also preserved since the 16th century are some chairs made from wood or lacquered wood, that possess an astonishing familiarity to representations of ancient chairs.
Just the same as in Egypt, there were two iconic chair designs in China: a chair that had four legs and a folding stool. This chair has been designed both with and without arms but always having the square seat and straight stiles (straight side supports) to hold up the back. In one image, it has been seen, the stiles had been delicately curved on top of the arms in order to conform to the shape of the S-shaped back splat (the centre upright of the back). Together, all three limbs were mortised on the yoke-like top rail. Though the style of this back splat then had a foundation for English chairs in the Queen Anne period, wooden sections that only to a restricted ability embolden corner joints (and furthermore are loose into the bargain) indicate a feature signatory to Chinese chairs. The four legs are set through the seat frame, which closes upon the rounded staves. All the members are round in section or have rounded edges—referable perchance to the bamboo tradition. The seat is uncomfortable and might have had a plaited texture. These chairs demanded of the sitter to hold themselves stiff and upright; when too much weight is exerted on the back, the chair has a tendency to topple. In patriarchal Chinese houses of this period armchairs likely were kept only for older members of the family, for they were held in great respect.
The Chinese folding stool is presumed to have taken to China from the West. It does not vary that much from the Egyptian or Scandinavian folding stools, but it has a variation in that the top rail is intricately affixed to the two legs of the stool by using a curved member, which is usually designed with metal mounts. From a Western understanding the ultimate effect of both these furniture forms is stylized. The construction and aesthetic issues are combined in a style that is at the same time naïve and refined. The pieced-together appearance is an upshot of the way that the individual parts do not appear to have been joined together by use of either glue or screws, but are mortised onto one another and held in its place in the style of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain in the 17th century also had its signature on the chair. Paintings project a design of chair with a relatively crude wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, with two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing in between the layers, stitched to show up a pattern of small pads. The front board and a corresponding board from the back could be folded after loosening some small iron hooks. Therefore the chair was an easily portable piece of furniture while traveling which, during the same period, possessed the dignity of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered type of chair is found in engravings of interiors of affluent Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, as well as in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. Though this style of chair is also found in countries where Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won critical acclaim, it is not determined that the innovation actually was born in The Netherlands. Typically, the legs of the chair are smooth, round in section, and of slender dimensions; they are in some cases baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is unquestionably a bourgeois piece of furniture and was made in vast numbers, as can be seen from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which a whole row of those chairs lined up against a wall. The form asserts itself with its harmonious proportions and expensive upholstery in gilt leather or fabric framed with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature form—that is to say, as developed in Paris around 1750—spread over most of Europe and was imitated or copied in the mid-20th century. The design owes this popularity to a combination of comfort and delicacy. The seat conforms to the human body and allows a relaxed sitting position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Normally the seat and back are upholstered, and there are little upholstered pads covering the armrests. Smooth transitions are achieved between seat frame, legs, and back disguise all the joints, which are constructed solidly on craftsmanlike methodology despite the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of them are constructed from wood of relatively thick dimensions; but all the members are deeply molded, all extraneous wood has been removed, and finer chairs can be further embellished with intricately delicate and decorative engraving. The wood can be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry is used for all the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; cane is in some cases used as an alternative to upholstery.
English chairs of the 18th century were more variable in form than the French. The French preference for stylistic uniformity, which spread from the highest circles in Paris and Versailles through most of France and was popular in large parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became reknowned and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
During the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper versions of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, hint that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on executive furniture in Melbourne contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.