From each of the furniture needs, the chair might be of most importance. While most of the other objects (except the bed) are created to support objects, the chair supports the human form. The term chair must be used here in the largest sense, from stool to throne to derivative forms including a bench and sofa, which may be looked upon as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not clearly distinuishable.
The social history of the chair is as exciting as its history as an art and craft. The chair is not just a physical support and an aesthetic creation; it historically is a signifier of social rank. Within the Medieval royal courts there were clear distinctions between sitting on a chair with arms, sitting on a chair with a back but without arms, or worse having to squat on a stool. From the past century, a director’s and/or manager’s chair has risen a signifier of superior standing, like in democratic parliaments the speaker sits on a high-set floor.
As a furniture form, the chair encompasses a number of variations. There are chairs manufactured to fit man’s age and physical abilities (the high chair, the wheelchair) and for his status in society (the executive chair, the throne). In historical times there were chairs used for birth (birth chairs); during the 20th century, there have been chairs used for ending life (the electric chair). We design chairs with one, two, three, or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We have chairs that can be folded and put away, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Modern day living has derived particular chairs for use in automobiles and aircraft. Each of these chair forms has changed to suit to evolving human uses. For its significant association with man, the chair exists to its full importance only when used. Although it is irrelevant to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a set of drawers if there might be anything inside or not, a chair is really seen best and judged best by a person utilising it, for chair and sitter suit each other. Thus the different parts of the chair have been labeled likened to the areas of a human parts: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the elemental function of your chair is to support our body, its credit is tested primarily from how well it measures up to this practical job. Within the build of the chair, the builder is restricted in certain static law and principal measurements. In these regulations, however, the chair creator has marvellous freedom.
The history of the chair extends over an era of several thousand years. There is evidence of societies that held iconic chair types, seen of the highest endeavour in the spheres of technique and design. Out of those peoples, special mention can be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the ascendancy of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the construct of expert make, are found from tombs. The first of these is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The original Egyptian chair has four legs crafted similar to those of some animal, a curved seat, and with a sloping back supported with vertical stretchers. In this way a strong triangular form was created. There was from our understanding no marked change in the construction of Egyptian thrones and chairs for common peasantry. The simple difference lies in the type of ornamentation, in the particulars of pricey inlays. The Egyptian folding stool most likely was designed as an easily carried seat for soldiers. As a camp stool this type existed during much later points. But the stool then also was designed for the role of a ceremonial seat, its mechanical task as a folding stool ignored or forgotten. This can from today be noted, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, executed in ebony with ivory inlay decoration and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They are in the construction of folding stools but are not able to be folded as the seats are created of wood. The plain manufacture of the folding stool, composed of two frames that spin on metal bolts and support a seat of leather or fabric secured between them, appeared but somewhat later as the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The best known of this kind is the folding stool, made out of ashwood, now seen at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The typical Greek chair, the klismos, is known not with any ancient specimen still existing but as found in a variety of pictorial material. The most well known is the klismos placed on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial location just out of Athens (c. 410 BC). This klismos is a chair that had a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, but only two of these legs could be shown. These strange legs were most likely to have been executed from bent wood and were thus put under huge pressure with the weight of the sitter. The joints attaching the legs to the frame of the seat were therefore extremely solid and were plainly pointed out.
The Romans borrowed from the Greek style; a number of models of seated Romans offer designs of a thicker and apparently somewhat less intricately built klismos. Both designs, light and heavy, were seen again during the Classicist period. The klismos design can be evidenced in French Empire chairs, in English Regency, and in special kinds of profound individuality around Denmark and Sweden circa 1800.
China
The progression of the chair in China is not able to be followed as long as chairs in Egypt and Greece. From the time of the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) a full folio of images and paintings had been protected, displaying the interior and outside of Chinese homes and the furniture. Kept also of the 16th century are a collection of chairs constructed of wood or lacquered wood, that possess an amazing likeness to styles of past chairs.
Just the same as in Egypt, there existed two iconic chair designs in China: a chair having four legs and a folding stool. This chair is seen both with and without arms although never without its square seat and straight stiles (vertical side supports) to support the back. In one image, it has been found, the stiles are marginally curved over the arms so as to sit right with the form of the S-shaped back splat (the centre upright of the back). Together, the three limbs were mortised on the yoke-like top rail. While the innovation of this back splat had an introduction for English chairs in the Queen Anne period, wooden pieces that merely to a limited extent stabilise corner joints (and furthermore are loose in the result) indicate an element exclusive to Chinese chairs. The four legs are set through the seat frame, which finishes upon the rounded staves. All the members are round in section or is given rounded edges—references perhaps to the bamboo tradition. The seat is unpleasant to sit in and may have a plaited seat. These chairs required the sitter to remain stiff and upright; for if too much weight is pushed on the back, the chair has a tendency to topple. In patriarchal Chinese households of this era armchairs most likely were reserved only for the senior individuals, for they were given great esteem.
The Chinese folding stool is presumed to have come to China from the West. It does not vary much from the Egyptian and Scandinavian folding stools, but it possesses a change in that the top rail is elegantly joined to the two legs of the stool with a curved member, which is generally designed with metal mounts. From a Western understanding the resulting effect of both furniture items is stylized. The manufacture and aesthetic parts are combined in a way that is at the same time naïve and refined. The patchwork appearance is an upshot of the manner that the individual items do not look to have been put together with either glue or screws, but were mortised on one another and held in position in the style of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain during the 17th century also had its name on the chair. Paintings show a kind of chair with a relatively crude wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, possessing two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing between the layers, stitched to bring up a pattern of tiny pads. The front board and a related board from the back could be folded after unscrewing some tiny iron hooks. Thus the chair was an easily portable piece of furniture while traveling which, at the same era, possessed the dignity of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered design of chair can be seen in engravings of the interior of affluent Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, and in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. Though this kind of chair may also be seen in countries where Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won acclaim, it is not held that the style actually started in The Netherlands. Generally, the legs of the chair were smooth, round in section, and of thin shape; they are sometimes baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is unquestionably a bourgeois piece of furniture and was produced in vast amounts, as evidenced from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which there is an entire row of such chairs lined up against a wall. The form asserts itself with its shapely proportions and delicate upholstery in gilt leather or fabric framed with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature style—that was, to say, as created in Paris around 1750—disseminated over most of Europe and has been imitated or copied during the mid-20th century. The model owes the popularity to a combination of leisure and elegance. The seat suits to the human body and grants a relaxed sitting position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Generally the seat and back are upholstered, and there are tiny upholstered pads on the armrests. Smooth transitions are found between seat frame, legs, and back disguise all the joints, which are constructed solidly on craftsmanlike principles even with the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of those are made from wood of fairly thick measurements; but every member is deeply molded, all superfluous wood has been sanded away, and finer chairs would be further embellished with intricately delicate and decorative woodwork. The wood can be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry should be used for the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; canework is occasionally used rather than upholstery.
English chairs in the 18th century were more variable in design than the French. The French touch for stylistic uniformity, which came from the aristocratic circles in Paris and Versailles through most of France and found favour in large parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became popularised and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
Within the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper products of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, hint that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on office chairs in Melbourne contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.