Out of all furniture objects, the chair might be the most imperative. While most other objects (save for the bed) are created to support objects, the chair supports a human form. The term chair should be looked upon here in the larger sense, from stool to throne to further items including a bench and sofa, which might be viewed as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not obviously defined.
The social history of the chair is as curious as its history as a creative art. The chair is not simply a physical support and aesthetic creation; it is also semiotic of social standing. In the past royal courts there were important differences between having a chair with arms, or a chair with a back but without arms, and having to use a stool. During the recent century, the director’s and manager’s chair has been a signifier of superior rank, as well as in democratic governments the speaker sits on an elevated platform.
In its furniture form, the chair is utilised for a variety of different forms. There are chairs structured to match man’s age and physical condition (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to denote his rank in society (the executive chair, the throne). During the olden days there were chairs for birthing (birth chairs); during the 20th century, there have been chairs used to die in (the electric chair). We have chairs with one, two, three, or four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. There are chairs that can be folded up, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Our contemporary lifestyle has developed special chairs for automobiles and aircraft. All these chair forms have been adapted to match to different human uses. Due to its significant relationship with man, the chair lives to its full purpose only when used. Although it doesn’t make a difference to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a set of drawers whether there might be items inside or not, a chair is best seen and judged best with a person sitting in it, for chair and sitter require the other. Thus the individual parts of a chair are given names likened to the areas of the human shape: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the principal purpose of the chair is to support the body, its credit is valued firstly from how well it measures up to this practical function. Within the manufacture of the chair, the maker is bound within the static laws and principal measurements. Through these limitations, however, the chair designer has great freedom.
The history of the chair lasts over an epoch of several thousand years. There were civilizations that have created distinctive chair forms, seen of the highest endeavour in the industries of handling and creativity. In such peoples, individual mention can be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the lives of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the structures of expert scheme, were known from findings made in tombs. The first of these is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The original Egyptian chair had four legs formed not unlike those of a designated animal, a curved seat, and a sloping back supported by vertical stretchers. From this a durable triangular construction was crafted. There seems to be no marked change between the structure of Egyptian thrones and chairs for ordinary peasantry. The real difference was in the complex ornamentation, in the evidence of more costly inlays. The Egyptian folding stool most probably was designed to be an easily carried seat for officers. As a camp stool this chair stayed during much later periods. But the stool then also was created as the use of a ceremonial seat, its mechanical function as a folding stool ignored or forgotten. This can from today’s evidence be seen, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, executed in ebony with ivory inlay decoration and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They are in the form of folding stools but are not able to be folded because the seats are formed out of wood. The plain manufacture of the folding stool, composed of two frames that turn on metal bolts and support a seat of leather or fabric set between them, can be seen but somewhat later from the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The better known of this kind is the folding stool, made out of ashwood, now found at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The significant Greek chair, the klismos, is known not as any ancient object still extant but found in a wealth of pictorial evidence. The archetype is the klismos drawn on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial location in outer Athens (c. 410 BC). This is a chair with a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, but only two of those would be displayed. These strange legs were most likely to be manufactured with bent wood and were thus subjected to a large amount of pressure under the weight of the sitter. The joints holding the legs to the frame of the seat had to be therefore very strong and were visibly drawn.
The Romans emulated the Greek style; some models of seated Romans offer designs of a more heavyset and in appearance rather crudely built klismos. Both styles, light or heavy, were revived in the Classicist epoch. The klismos style is known in French Empire chairs, in English Regency, and in some particular forms of notable uniqueness around Denmark and Sweden around 1800.
China
The ancestry of the chair in China is not able to be followed as far as the history of chairs in Egypt and Greece. Since the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an unscathed collection of drawings and artworks has been kept, showing the interior and exteriors of Chinese households and their furniture. Also preserved of the 16th century are a trove of chairs made of wood or lacquered wood, that display an astonishing resemblance to representations of ancient chairs.
As were the designs in Egypt, two iconic chair forms existed in China: a chair of four legs and a folding stool. That chair was designed both with and without arms however never missing the square seat and straight stiles (standing side supports) to firm the back. In one image, however, the stiles were slightly curved over the arms so as to conform to the angle of the S-shaped back splat (the central upright of the back). The three limbs are mortised into the yoke-like top rail. Though the idea of a back splat had an introduction for English chairs during the Queen Anne period, wooden members that just to a limited ability stabilise corner joints (and are loose to top it off) are a feature solely to Chinese chairs. The four legs are set through the seat frame, which closes about the rounded staves. All the members are round in section or possesses rounded edges—an acknowledgement maybe to the bamboo tradition. The seat is not pleasant and may have a plaited seat. These chairs required of the sitter to remain stiff and upright; for if too much weight is exerted on the back, the chair has a tendency to collapse. In patriarchal Chinese households of this epoch armchairs probably were kept only for older people, for they were respected greatly.
The Chinese folding stool is understood to have come to China from the West. It does not differ very much from the Egyptian or Scandinavian folding stools, but it has a difference in that the top rail is delicately affixed to the two legs of the stool by means of a curved member, which is often seen with metal mounts. From a Western understanding the ultimate effect of both these furniture designs is stylized. The construction and decorative issues are combined in a manner that is both naïve and refined. The piecemeal appearance is a result of the way that the individual items do not appear to have been constructed by means of either glue or screws, but are mortised on one another and fixed in position in the manner of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain during the 17th century also put its name on the chair. Artworks show a type of chair with a relatively unrefined wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, having only two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing between, stitched to produce a pattern of small pads. The front board and a related board in the back could be folded after unscrewing some small iron hooks. Therefore the chair was a portable piece of furniture when traveling which, in the same era, granted the status of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered style of chair is evidenced in engravings of the interiors of rich Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, and in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. While this style of chair is also seen in countries in which Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won critical acclaim, it is not decided that the style actually began in The Netherlands. Normally, the legs of the chair were smooth, round in section, and of slender measurements; they are occasionally baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is unquestionably a bourgeois piece of furniture and was crafted in vast amounts, as evidenced from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which there is a row of these chairs lined up along a wall. The form asserts itself by virtue of its shapely proportions and expensive upholstery in gilt leather or fabric bordered with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature style—that is, as developed in Paris around 1750—conquered most of Europe and has been imitated or copied during the mid-20th century. The style owes the popularity to a combination of leisure and charm. The seat conforms to the human body and allows a relaxed seated position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Usually the seat and back are upholstered, and there are tiny upholstered pads on the armrests. Smooth transitions are achieved between seat frame, legs, and back conceal all the joints, which are constructed solidly on craftsmanlike practices even with the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of those use wood of rather thick dimensions; but each member is deeply molded, all superfluous wood has been sanded away, and more upmarket items can be further embellished with highly delicate and decorative engraving. The wood may be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry can be used for the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; crosshatched cane is occasionally used rather than upholstery.
English chairs of the 18th century were more varied in design than the French. The French manner for stylistic uniformity, which came from the highest circles in Paris and Versailles over most of France and found favour in several parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became commonly known and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
During the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper styles of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, indicate that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on office furniture in Melbourne contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.