Out of all furniture pieces, the chair might be of the most importance. While the majority of other forms (save the bed) are meant to support objects, the chair supports your human form. The term chair is used here in the larger sense, from stool to throne to derivative kinds such as the bench and sofa, which might be viewed as extended or connected chairs, and whose character (i.e., whether they are intended for sitting or reclining) is not clearly distinuishable.
The social history of the chair is as exciting as its history as a creative craft. The chair is not just a physical support and aesthetic piece of art; it historically is an indicator of social hierarchy. In the Medieval royal courts there were social signifiers between having a chair with arms, on a chair with a back but without arms, or worse having to use a stool. In the past century, a director’s and manager’s chair has developed iconic of superior rank, and even in democratic parliaments the speaker sits on a high-set level.
In its furniture construction, the chair can be employed for a number of different models. There are chairs designed to suit man’s age and physical capabilities (the high chair, the wheelchair) and to indicate his rank in society (the executive chair, the throne). In past times there were chairs used for birth (birth chairs); in the 20th century, there have been chairs to die in (the electric chair). We have chairs with one, two, three, and four legs, chairs with or without arms, and chairs with or without backs. We make chairs that can be folded and put away, chairs on wheels, and chairs on runners.
Our contemporary lifestyle has derived special chairs in automobiles and aircraft. Each and every one of these chair forms have been changed to match to evolving human desires. For its close importance with man, the chair lives to its full importance only when being utilised. While it doesn’t make a difference to one’s appreciation of a cupboard or a bureau if there are things inside or not, a chair is understood best and fairly evaluated with a person utilising it, because chair and sitter complement one another. Thus the different parts of a chair are given names likened to the elements of our human parts: arms, legs, feet, back, and seat.
Because the clear function of your chair is to support our human body, its worth is judged primarily by how well it fulfills this practical purpose. In the creation of the chair, the carpenter is limited under particular static rules and principal measurements. In these regulations, however, the chair builder has awesome freedom.
The history of the chair extends over an epoch of several thousand years. There existed societies that made significant chair types, as expressions of the topmost task in the spheres of craft and aesthetics. Among those cultures, individual mention needs to be made of ancient Egypt and Greece; China; Spain and The Netherlands in the 17th century; England in the 18th century; and France in the 18th century during the reigns of Louis XV and Louis XVI.
Egypt
Two ancient Egyptian chair forms, both the construct of masterful scheme, are now found from findings made in tombs. The first one of the two is a four-legged chair with a back, the other a folding stool. The typical Egyptian chair would have four legs designed not unlike those of a particular animal, a curved seat, and leading to a sloping back supported above vertical stretchers. In this way a strong triangular design was obtained. There was in our understanding no particular variation in the creation of Egyptian thrones and chairs for regular citizens. The general change was in the type of ornamentation, in the evidence of pricey inlays. The Egyptian folding stool in all probability was created for an easily packed seat for soldiers. As a camp stool that type persevered til much later days. But the stool then also was created for the task of a ceremonial seat, its original task as a folding stool ignored or forgotten. This can already be observed, from as early as 1366–57 BC in two stools, formed in ebony with ivory inlay ornamentation and gold mounts, from the tomb of Tutankhamen. They are constructed in the structure of folding stools but can not be folded as the seats were formed with wood. The easy make of the folding stool, consisting of two frames that spin on metal bolts and support a seat of leather or fabric secured between them, was seen again but some time later as the Bronze Age folding chairs of Scandinavia and northern Germany. The best known of those is the folding stool, made of ashwood, seen at Guldhøj (National Museum in Copenhagen).
Greece and Rome
The unique Greek chair, the klismos, is seen not as any ancient fossil still existing but in a wealth of pictorial material. The best recognised is the klismos placed on the Hegeso Stele at the Dipylon burial location just out of Athens (c. 410 BC). It is a chair with a backward-sloping, curved backboard and four curving legs, only two of those could be shown. These unique legs were presumably manufactured in bent wood and were therefore had huge pressure under the weight of the sitter. The joints attaching the legs to the frame of the seat would have been therefore very strong and were visibly signified.
The Romans embued the Greek style; a number of models of seated Romans offer designs of a heavier and in appearance slightly less intricately crafted klismos. Both kinds, the light and heavy, were brought back during the Classicist era. The klismos influence is found in French Empire design, in English Regency, and in some special kinds of considerable individuality in Denmark and Sweden during 1800.
China
The past of the chair in China cannot be tracked as far back as the progression of the chair in Egypt and Greece. From the time of the Tang dynasty (AD 618–907) an unscathed serial of drawings and artworks had been protected, detailing the inside and outer parts of Chinese homes and the kinds of furniture. Also kept from the 16th century are a number of chairs constructed from wood or lacquered wood, that display an intriguing resemblance to images of older chairs.
As were the designs in Egypt, there were two standard chair designs in China: a chair having four legs and a folding stool. The four-legged chair was designed both with and without arms but never missing its square seat and straight stiles (upright side supports) to support the back. In one image, though, the stiles had been marginally curved by the arms so as to suit the structure of the S-shaped back splat (the main upright of its chairback). Each of the three sections had been mortised onto the yoke-like top rail. Although the idea of the Chinese back splat later had an introduction for English chairs in the Queen Anne period, wooden items that only just to a restricted extent reinforce corner joints (and are loose in the bargain) indicate a design solely to Chinese chairs. The four legs are set through the seat frame, which closes around the rounded staves. Each member is round in section or possesses rounded edges—an acknowledgement perhaps to the bamboo tradition. The seat is uncomfortable and might have had a plaited form. These chairs required the sitter to stay stiff and upright; when too much weight is exerted on the back, the chair has a tendency to topple over. In patriarchal Chinese homes of this period armchairs probably were only for older members of the family, for they were greatly respected.
The Chinese folding stool is understood to have been brought to China from the West. It is not dissimilar much from the Egyptian or Scandinavian folding stools, but it possesses a change in that the top rail is delicately affixed to the two legs of the stool by use of a curved member, which is often provided with metal mounts. From a Western point of view the overall effect of these two furniture designs is stylized. The structure and aesthetic elements are combined in a way that is all at once naïve and refined. The pieced-together appearance is a result of the manner that the individual parts do not seem to have been constructed by either glue or screws, but were mortised on one another and held in place in the manner of a Chinese puzzle.
Spain: 17th century
The Golden Age of Spain during the 17th century also left its mark on the chair. Artworks display a design of chair with a relatively crude wooden frame; a back and seat, nailed on, having only two layers of leather, with horsehair stuffing between, stitched to bring up a pattern of small pads. The front board and a related board from the back could be folded after unscrewing some little iron hooks. Thus the chair was an easily portable piece of furniture while traveling which, during the same era, gave the status of a four-legged, high-backed armchair.
The Netherlands: 17th century
A low, square, upholstered type of chair can be displayed in engravings of the interior of rich Dutch homes by Abraham Bosse, a French artist, as well as in paintings by the Dutch artists Johannes Vermeer and Gerard Terborch. While this type of chair may also be found in countries where Dutch styles of interior decoration and Dutch furniture won preference, it is not determined that the style actually started in The Netherlands. Usually, the legs of the chair will be smooth, round in section, and of slim dimensions; they are in some cases baluster-shaped (vase-shaped) or twisted. It is unquestionably a bourgeois piece of furniture and was manufactured in vast quantities, as evidenced from one of Abraham Bosse’s engravings, in which there is an entire row of such chairs lined up by a wall. The style asserts itself by its harmonious proportions and delicate upholstery in gilt leather or fabric bordered with fringes.
France and England: 17th and 18th centuries
The French Rococo chair in its most mature style—that is, as created in Paris around 1750—disseminated through most of Europe and has been imitated or copied in the mid-20th century. The model owes this popularity to a combination of relaxation and charm. The seat adheres to the human body and grants a relaxed sitting position. The back is bow-shaped, the legs curved. Usually the seat and back are upholstered, and there are small upholstered pads on the armrests. Smooth transitions are made between seat frame, legs, and back cover all the joints, which are constructed strongly on craftsmanlike methods despite the absence of stretchers between the legs.
French Rococo chairs and imitations of those use wood of fairly thick density; but all members are deeply molded, all extraneous wood has been removed, and more upmarket items might be further embellished with intricately delicate and decorative carvings. The wood can be varnished, stained, painted, or gilded. Silk damask or tapestry is often used for the upholstery on the seat, back, and armrests; cane is occasionally used rather than upholstery.
English chairs of the 18th century were more variable in style than the French. The French preference for stylistic uniformity, which came from the royal circles in Paris and Versailles within most of France and was popularised in many parts of the Continent, had no parallel in England. Prior to 1740, the most commonly used wood was walnut; thereafter, and for the rest of the century, it was mahogany. Walnut, though beautiful in hue, was soft and therefore less suited to wood carving than to rounded, curving forms. Outer surfaces, such as the back and seat frame, were usually veneered. During the walnut period, highly overstuffed armchairs, covered with leather or embroidered material, were also developed. The best upholstery of this period is precisely and firmly modelled and accentuated by braiding or tacks. When imports of mahogany became common, no specifically new chair designs appeared, but the character of the woodwork changed. Mahogany, having a firmer, closer grain, could be cut thinner, which meant that individual parts of the chair could be more slender in shape. Mahogany also lent itself better to carving than walnut. Carving was concentrated more on the arms and back than on the legs, which as a rule were straight and smooth with chamfered (bevelled) edges and molding. There was a wealth of variety in chairback designs, featuring elegant, pierced, vase-shaped splats or two upright posts connected by horizontal slats (ladderback).
Alongside the French Rococo chair and the best English chairs in walnut and mahogany, the stick-back chair was relatively unaffected by the stylistic changes of the day. Originally a medieval form, known, for example, from paintings by Pieter Bruegel the Elder and still found in mid-20th century in the churches and inns of southern Europe, the stick-back chair (in all of its variations) consists basically of a solid, saddle-shaped seat into which the legs, back staves, and possibly the armrests are directly mortised. This typically peasant form underwent a renewal and a process of refinement in England and America during the 18th century. Under the name Windsor chair (a term that seems to have been used for the first time in 1731) or Philadelphia chair, it became popularised and was widely distributed throughout the world.
Late 18th to 20th century
Within the Neoclassical period, no basic changes took place in chair forms, but legs became straight and dimensions lighter. Backs in the shape of classical vases replaced the fanciful outlines of the Rococo period. Around 1800, freely executed imitations of Greek and Roman chairs of the klismos type, with curved legs and backrest, appeared. French chairs of the Empire period, executed in dark mahogany and embellished with ornate bronze mounts, created a ponderous effect.
In cheaper products of inferior workmanship, bourgeois chairs of the 19th century carried on the traditions of the 17th and 18th centuries. The only real innovations were the bentwood (wood that has been bent and shaped) chairs in beech that became popular all over the world and were still made in the 20th century. Around 1900 the continental Art Nouveau and Jugendstil styles (French and German styles characterized by organic foliate forms, sinuous lines, and non-geometric forms), and the Arts and Crafts movement in England (established by the English poet and decorator William Morris to reintroduce idealized standards of medieval craftsmanship), gave rise to original chair designs by Eugène Gaillard in France, Henry van de Velde in Belgium, Josef Hoffman in Austria, Antonio Gaudí in Spain, and Charles Rennie Mackintosh in Scotland. These new furniture styles did not exercise wide, let alone decisive, influence. The Art Nouveau chairs designed by the French architect Hector Guimard, for example, are collector’s pieces, but his name is known to a broader public only because of his fanciful entrances to the Paris Métro.
Modern
After World War I, the Bauhaus school in Germany became a creative centre for revolutionary thinking, resulting, for example, in tubular steel chairs designed by the architects Marcel Breuer, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, and others. During World War II, the aircraft industry accelerated the development of laminated wood and molded plastic furniture. The dominant chair forms of this period go back to designs by Alvar Aalto, Bruno Mathsson, and Charles and Ray Eames. Rapid technical developments, in conjunction with an ever-increasing interest in human-factors engineering, or ergonomics, indicate that completely new chair forms will probably be evolved in the future.
For a great deal on reception desks in Melbourne contact Fast Office Furniture today and check our specials.